Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Post Mortem (1012 Views)
Posted by: Silver Charm (IP Logged)
Date: May 22, 2016 08:21AM

ringato3 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 11 pm after exaggerator hangs the first L on
> Nyquist and not a lot on the board regarding the
> race. Perhaps all of us are "decompressing"
> after a few days of heavy gambling.
>
> One persons thoughts on the race:
>
> 1. Considering track condition and the amount of
> speed that seemed to be in the race, far from a
> surprising result.
>
> 2. As a guy who bet exaggerator in both the
> derby and preakness and has been anti-Nyquist for
> a long time, I have to say Nyquist ran pretty
> well, considering the pace of the race.
>
> 3. Speaking of pace, a pretty dumb ride by Mario
> Gutierrez. Jockey critiquing happens every
> single race, every single day, but it see,s
> deserved here. Nyquist left hard, so as not to
> get trapped down inside, a good move, but once the
> 4 backed off out of the first turn, did Mario
> really have to go after uncle Lino at the 22
> quarter? He was more afraid of uncle Lino getting
> away than he was of confirmed quality closer, top
> challenger and possible mud lover, exaggerator.
> Yikes. Awful ride IMO. Hard to say what
> happens if he rates a bit, but Nyquist wasn't
> packing it in until late.certainly would have been
> closer.
>
> 4. Kent D. Gave the winner a helluva ride. He
> won by 3 and was never in doubt late, but if it
> had been closer, the ground he saved and the
> inside out move would have been crucial
>
> 5. I still don't have a handle on exaggerator.
> Hard to say that about a horse I bet in both legs
> of the triple crown so far, but in the derby I had
> to use him what appeared to me to be the "perfect"
> derby sheet, and in the preakness he figured to
> benefit from the pace and surface, while running
> very well in defeat in the derby. I say tough to
> have a handle because the detractors will point to
> another wet track and fast pace, like the santa
> Anita derby. But this horse fires hard every
> time.
>
> 6. Stradivari ran ok with a wide trip.

The pace in the Derby was fast and Mario had Nyquist right there in it. They were too confident with what they had. The move Exaggerator made on the backstretch was fully expected by me. This horse knows how to run on the rail. Go back and look at his Saratoga Special race and 2 Juvenile races at Kee. Kent D gave him too much work to do in the Derby stretch or he might have won.

The questions now are how much did Nyquist back up? 2 Points? And how much was from pace fatigue? It didn't bother him in the Derby until the last 100 yards. The best horse won yesterday. The Derby will probably be the last time Nyquist ever beats Exagerrator at a Mile and 1/4. And there are others out there poised to begin catching up with Nyquist. Perhaps he should run back on Belmont Day. But in the Met Mile....

Regarding Strativari where was Mohaymen yesterday? He could have done some damage. People are afraid to take a chance these days. Exaggerator moves on and now he becomes the target. Brodys Cause and others will be waiting. It will be another excellent wagering day!!



Subject Written By Posted
Post Mortem (1783 Views) ringato3 05/21/2016 11:23PM
Re: Post Mortem (1194 Views) Bet Twice 05/21/2016 11:38PM
Re: Post Mortem (1122 Views) TempletonPeck 05/22/2016 12:48AM
Re: Post Mortem (1071 Views) joemama 05/22/2016 05:30AM
Re: Post Mortem (1128 Views) miff 05/22/2016 08:04AM
Re: Post Mortem (1226 Views) TGJB 05/22/2016 09:47AM
Re: Post Mortem (1148 Views) FrankD. 05/22/2016 09:56AM
Re: Post Mortem (1143 Views) TGJB 05/22/2016 10:15AM
Re: Post Mortem (986 Views) FrankD. 05/22/2016 10:17AM
Re: Post Mortem (907 Views) jerry 05/22/2016 12:49PM
Re: Post Mortem (871 Views) Topcat 05/22/2016 12:12PM
Re: Post Mortem (866 Views) Gerard 05/22/2016 02:03PM
Re: Post Mortem (858 Views) boardedup 05/22/2016 02:25PM
Re: Post Mortem (787 Views) Gerard 05/22/2016 03:09PM
Re: Post Mortem (960 Views) FrankD. 05/22/2016 03:31PM
Re: Post Mortem (821 Views) Gerard 05/22/2016 04:08PM
Re: Post Mortem (849 Views) boardedup 05/22/2016 02:20PM
Re: Pimlico Run-Ups (1000 Views) BitPlayer 05/22/2016 10:14AM
Re: Pimlico Run-Ups (1026 Views) TGJB 05/22/2016 10:20AM
Re: Pimlico Run-Ups (941 Views) miff 05/22/2016 10:28AM
Re: Post Mortem (924 Views) Leamas57 05/22/2016 10:16AM
Re: Post Mortem (958 Views) miff 05/22/2016 10:31AM
Re: Post Mortem (1010 Views) TGJB 05/22/2016 10:42AM
Re: Post Mortem (925 Views) miff 05/22/2016 11:11AM
Re: Post Mortem (964 Views) Leamas57 05/22/2016 11:13AM
Re: Post Mortem (926 Views) miff 05/22/2016 11:25AM
Re: Post Mortem (876 Views) Leamas57 05/22/2016 11:44AM
Re: Post Mortem (952 Views) miff 05/22/2016 12:00PM
Re: Post Mortem (910 Views) Leamas57 05/22/2016 12:12PM
Re: Post Mortem (851 Views) boardedup 05/22/2016 02:37PM
Re: Post Mortem (805 Views) Leamas57 05/22/2016 03:22PM
Re: Post Mortem (826 Views) jerry 05/22/2016 04:35PM
Re: Post Mortem (803 Views) RICH 05/23/2016 09:51AM
Re: Post Mortem (1025 Views) jbelfior 05/22/2016 08:42AM
Re: Post Mortem (1012 Views) Silver Charm 05/22/2016 08:21AM
Re: Post Mortem (1112 Views) ringato3 05/22/2016 09:03AM
Re: Post Mortem (843 Views) Silver Charm 05/22/2016 09:22AM
Re: Post Mortem (756 Views) meatloaf 05/22/2016 04:36PM
Re: Post Mortem (921 Views) NormandyInvasion 05/22/2016 06:05PM
Re: Post Mortem (889 Views) T Severini 05/22/2016 09:51PM
Re: Post Mortem (727 Views) miff 05/23/2016 09:33AM
Re: Post Mortem (779 Views) T Severini 05/23/2016 09:02PM
Re: Post Mortem (826 Views) johnnym 05/23/2016 10:18AM
Re: Post Mortem (837 Views) Topcat 05/23/2016 10:52AM
Re: Post Mortem (738 Views) rhagood 05/23/2016 11:27AM
Re: Post Mortem (809 Views) johnnym 05/23/2016 11:27AM
Re: Post Mortem (986 Views) mjellish 05/23/2016 02:31PM
Re: Post Mortem (848 Views) Silver Charm 05/23/2016 02:45PM
Re: Post Mortem (802 Views) ringato3 05/23/2016 03:18PM
Re: Post Mortem (851 Views) P-Dub 05/23/2016 03:47PM
Re: Post Mortem (807 Views) ringato3 05/23/2016 04:01PM
Re: Post Mortem (998 Views) mjellish 05/23/2016 04:43PM
Re: Post Mortem (917 Views) Paolo 05/23/2016 05:14PM
Re: Post Mortem (806 Views) P-Dub 05/24/2016 03:50AM
Re: Post Mortem (844 Views) richiebee 05/24/2016 05:08AM
Re: Post Mortem (799 Views) FrankD. 05/24/2016 07:04AM
Re: Post Mortem (880 Views) TempletonPeck 05/23/2016 03:43PM
Re: Post Mortem (843 Views) bobphilo 05/23/2016 06:44PM
Re: Post Mortem (844 Views) FrankD. 05/23/2016 07:08PM
Re: Post Mortem (837 Views) TempletonPeck 05/23/2016 07:27PM
Re: Post Mortem (833 Views) FrankD. 05/23/2016 07:33PM
Re: Post Mortem (883 Views) TempletonPeck 05/23/2016 07:51PM
Re: Post Mortem (909 Views) Silver Charm 05/23/2016 09:30PM
Re: Post Mortem (944 Views) TGJB 05/24/2016 12:00AM
Re: Post Mortem (746 Views) jbelfior 05/24/2016 09:37AM
Re: Post Mortem (1069 Views) FrankD. 05/24/2016 09:46AM
Re: Post Mortem (836 Views) jbelfior 05/24/2016 11:08AM
Re: Post Mortem (841 Views) FrankD. 05/24/2016 11:11AM
Re: Post Mortem (719 Views) pizzalove 05/24/2016 04:03PM
Re: Post Mortem (751 Views) Topcat 05/24/2016 05:07AM
Re: Post Mortem (787 Views) pizzalove 05/24/2016 04:02PM
Re: Post Mortem (958 Views) Leamas57 05/23/2016 08:36PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.