Re: Just following up... (921 Views)
Posted by:
TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: May 27, 2016 04:44PM
Let's say for a moment, that's all true. But how do you get THERE, the way they did it (or the way you want to)? What's the methodology that gets you to that particular variant?
I refrained from any characterizations in my post. I'm not interested in bashing them here (as opposed to certain other times)-- I'm trying to get people thinking about methodology, and differences thereof.
The race, the way we did it, is still up. As it happened it fit with the surrounding races, but if it didn't I still would have done it that way, because that's the way it made the most sense, and with the time gaps (more than 2 hourse since the previous dirt race), unusual distance and weather, ASSUMING the variant stayed the same would be... illogical, to be nice about it. It happened to be the same as the next race, but it didn't have to be.
So, how did they get there? How would you? What would you base your decision on?