Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (716 Views)
Posted by: bobphilo (IP Logged)
Date: June 14, 2016 03:28PM

Big Sandy is unique. The photos show he was sinking deeper into the track than the other horses.
I don't know how many times I have to say this. I have NEVER downplayed the fact that he very well may have bounced. It's possible to bounce and dislike the track too. The 2 are not mutually exclusive.



Subject Written By Posted
Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (1338 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 06:02PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (934 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 06:16PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (950 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 06:39PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (914 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 06:47PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (857 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:10PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (790 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:15PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (811 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (820 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:31PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (900 Views) miff 06/13/2016 07:37PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (781 Views) RICH 06/14/2016 06:07AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (1022 Views) miff 06/13/2016 06:48PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (947 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:21PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (867 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:36PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (779 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 08:16PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (854 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 08:23PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (858 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 08:55PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (849 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 09:28PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (927 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 09:58AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (828 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 10:01AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (782 Views) miff 06/14/2016 10:20AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (816 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 10:51AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (802 Views) miff 06/14/2016 11:40AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (851 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 11:50AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (852 Views) miff 06/14/2016 12:03PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (896 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 12:45PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (811 Views) jimbo66 06/14/2016 12:53PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (705 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 01:39PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (774 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 01:59PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (750 Views) miff 06/14/2016 02:20PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (783 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 02:34PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (825 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 02:43PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (678 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 06:35PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (843 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 07:26PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (707 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 02:25PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (746 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 11:29AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (769 Views) miff 06/14/2016 11:52AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (783 Views) jp702006 06/13/2016 08:34PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (768 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 08:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (883 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:22PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (909 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (834 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:45PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (911 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 08:36PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (584 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 02:20PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (777 Views) miff 06/14/2016 02:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (716 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 03:28PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (786 Views) Tavasco 06/14/2016 03:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (765 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 03:35PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (731 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 03:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (772 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 03:44PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (670 Views) richiebee 06/14/2016 03:57PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (718 Views) sekrah 06/14/2016 05:54PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (711 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 06:25PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.