Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
"Classic" Excuses (979 Views)
Posted by: derby1592 (IP Logged)
Date: September 30, 2003 01:18PM

OK,

I am trying to sort out the expected field for this year's BC Classic and it looks like we are not going to see arguably the top three older US horses in the most prestigious race of the year in the US for older horses (not to mention that it is the race with the biggest purse as well).

As far as I can tell, these are the stated reasons by the connections for not running:

1) One does not want to run because they have a royally bred colt that has tremendous value as a future stud.

2) Another does not want to run because they have a gelding that has zero value as a future stud.

3) The third does not want to run because they feel that a fourth race this year would be "over-racing."

Please correct me if I am wrong but if all connections applied these criteria in future BCs I think it would eliminate just about any possible entrant...

Cheers.

Chris



Post Edited (09-30-03 16:08)



Subject Written By Posted
"Classic" Excuses (979 Views) derby1592 09/30/2003 01:18PM
Re: No Subject (677 Views) Michael D. 09/30/2003 03:22PM
Re: No Subject (587 Views) magicnight 09/30/2003 03:44PM
Re: No Subject (697 Views) jbelfior 09/30/2003 04:02PM
Re: No Subject (667 Views) kev 09/30/2003 06:05PM
Re: No Subject (677 Views) HP 10/01/2003 09:17AM
Re: No Subject (684 Views) jbelfior 10/01/2003 10:29AM
Re: No Subject (670 Views) JimP 10/01/2003 10:45AM
Re: No Subject (674 Views) Michael D. 10/01/2003 12:10PM
Re: No Subject (573 Views) Michael D. 10/01/2003 12:14PM
Re: No Subject (587 Views) Silver Charm 10/01/2003 01:17PM
Re: No Subject (650 Views) HP 10/01/2003 03:00PM
Re: No Subject (755 Views) jbelfior 10/01/2003 04:15PM
Re: No Subject (579 Views) HP 10/01/2003 04:29PM
Re: No Subject (648 Views) JimP 10/02/2003 02:37PM
Re: No Subject/Dubai (617 Views) bdhsheets 10/02/2003 11:31PM
Re: No Subject/Dubai/Silver Charm (581 Views) Silver Charm 10/03/2003 11:14AM
Re: "Classic" Excuses (683 Views) jbelfior 10/01/2003 09:02AM
Re: "Classic" Excuses (710 Views) Frost King 10/01/2003 08:59PM
Re: "Classic" Excuses (659 Views) jbelfior 10/02/2003 02:13PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.