Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Miff (1152 Views)
Posted by: albatross (IP Logged)
Date: May 21, 2017 07:47PM

Jimbo66, I didn't hear Leon Blu's comments but find it very telling. I agree with you and him on BBt. Until you mentioned it, I didn't realize his record with Derby Winners going forward, that might never be matched. I was always a big fan of RFL, not in TC races but overall, and think BBt has certainly taken his place. Let's face it, those two got very good stock, just not as many of them as TAP. Is it possible that is the difference? Where they have more of a hands on approach. BBt has many assistants, but the horses are basically all in the same place, Ca. Until later in his career RFL had them all together, then sort of Ca. NY in the summer fall later in his career. I don't know the numbers under their care, but I expect TAP has two or three times the horses. I guess it all depends how you grade them, because TAP will leave the game with a higher net worth than about any trainer in history. To sum it up, if you have a top 3YO, and BBt will take him, why not.



Subject Written By Posted
Miff (1875 Views) Fairmount1 05/20/2017 07:14PM
Re: Miff (1216 Views) T Severini 05/20/2017 07:27PM
Re: Miff (1231 Views) Topcat 05/21/2017 08:12AM
Re: Miff (1205 Views) jimbo66 05/21/2017 10:08AM
Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (1252 Views) Silver Charm 05/21/2017 11:01AM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (1149 Views) jimbo66 05/21/2017 11:21AM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (1093 Views) Silver Charm 05/21/2017 11:34AM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (1126 Views) sekrah 05/21/2017 12:00PM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (1075 Views) rezlegal 05/21/2017 12:37PM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (1101 Views) jimbo66 05/21/2017 06:42PM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (1126 Views) sekrah 05/21/2017 06:58PM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (1079 Views) mjellish 05/22/2017 07:47PM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (953 Views) sekrah 05/22/2017 09:28PM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (858 Views) jimbo66 05/22/2017 10:26PM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (945 Views) jp702006 05/22/2017 10:48PM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (997 Views) hellersorr 05/22/2017 11:35PM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (896 Views) johnnym 05/23/2017 05:56AM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (870 Views) johnnym 05/23/2017 05:43AM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (1027 Views) bellsbendboy 05/23/2017 12:02AM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (1028 Views) TGJB 05/23/2017 01:12AM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (872 Views) Al Caught Up 05/23/2017 10:32AM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (936 Views) hellersorr 05/23/2017 11:38AM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (930 Views) richiebee 05/23/2017 04:33PM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (891 Views) Mathcapper 05/23/2017 05:31PM
Re: Not Being Combative Here Jimbo But! (937 Views) sekrah 05/23/2017 06:25AM
Re: Miff (1152 Views) albatross 05/21/2017 07:47PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.