Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
6/25 Belmont, for example (772 Views)
Posted by: TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: June 29, 2004 01:55PM
Last Friday at Belmont is a very good example of the kind of thing I discussed in the DRF Expo presentation, which can be found in the archives here. The track was listed as fast throughout, with no obvious weather until just before the last race, when it started to rain. To someone who doesn't get complete information about track maintenance, and/or makes the assumption that without a weather event track speed stays constant, the horses "must" have been running over the same track all day, in terms of track "speed".
In point of fact, an awful lot was going on. They watered the track before each of the first 5 races, and the track stayed basically the same speed (a little slower for the fifth). After the fifth they sealed the track, presumably in anticipation of the rain that came later, but then unsealed it again after the sixth (a grass race), and did not water the track again for the rest of the day. The track got MUCH slower-- by the end of the card, it was 12 points slower than when it began.
Now, accurate weather and groundskeeping info helps me piece together what is happening. But in the end it doesn't help me determine HOW fast the track was-- you can only do that by looking at the figure histories of the horses. And again-- if you either didn't have the info, or made the ASSUMPTION that since the track was fast and there was no significant weather the track must not have changed, you had to get it wrong. In all probability you would use what amounts to an average variant for the day, giving horses in the early races figures that are much too good, and later ones much too bad.
TGJB
6/25 Belmont, for example (772 Views) |
TGJB |
06/29/2004 01:55PM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example (564 Views)
|
Saddlecloth |
06/29/2004 05:03PM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example (549 Views)
|
slakboy |
06/29/2004 05:25PM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example (555 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/29/2004 05:43PM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example, question for Jerry (448 Views)
|
Josephus |
06/29/2004 10:52PM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example, question for Jerry (518 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/30/2004 01:30PM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example (560 Views)
|
|
06/30/2004 11:56AM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example (460 Views)
|
miff |
06/30/2004 12:14PM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example (545 Views)
|
beyerguy |
06/30/2004 12:42PM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example (577 Views)
|
miff |
06/30/2004 01:28PM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example (613 Views)
|
|
07/01/2004 12:50PM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example (573 Views)
|
HP |
07/02/2004 08:32AM |
Re: 6/25 Belmont, for example (508 Views)
|
miff |
07/02/2004 11:02AM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|