Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Hockessin Stakes Delaware Park, Race 6, July 13, 2019 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: more trouble at SA (476 Views)
Posted by: BB (IP Logged)
Date: March 28, 2019 11:15PM

As Rich Curtis suggested, racing seems to have trouble distinguishing between a lifeline and a noose.

Thought you all might like to know that PETA's laudatory statement from March 15th (below) has now been deleted from its site.

It's one thing for Belinda to have been played for a sap, but the Jockey Club really should have known better.

Last one leaving Santa Anita, please turn out the lights. As Dandy Don would say, the party's over.



Rich Curtis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Organizations who advocate for animal welfare
> have also affirmed their support for these
> measures. Kathy Guillermo, Senior Vice President
> for PETA said, 'PETA thanks Santa Anita for
> standing up to all those who have used any means
> to force injured or unfit horses to run. This is a
> historic moment for racing and PETA urges every
> track to recognize that the future is now and to
> follow suit. This groundbreaking plan will not
> bring back the 22 horses who have died recently,
> but it will prevent the deaths of many more and
> will set a new standard for racing that means less
> suffering for Thoroughbreds.'"
>
> You know they are desperate when they can no
> longer tell the difference between praise and a
> noose.



Subject Written By Posted
more trouble at SA (1255 Views) Blueskies 03/14/2019 01:23PM
Re: more trouble at SA (603 Views) P-Dub 03/14/2019 03:58PM
Re: more trouble at SA (568 Views) Fairmount1 03/14/2019 04:53PM
Re: more trouble at SA (525 Views) Dana666 03/14/2019 05:13PM
Re: more trouble at SA (488 Views) Fairmount1 03/14/2019 05:15PM
Re: more trouble at SA (490 Views) Dana666 03/14/2019 05:21PM
Re: more trouble at SA (536 Views) Fairmount1 03/14/2019 05:41PM
Re: more trouble at SA (491 Views) P-Dub 03/15/2019 01:22AM
Re: more trouble at SA (575 Views) TGJB 03/15/2019 01:47AM
Re: more trouble at SA (540 Views) breakage1 03/14/2019 05:43PM
Re: more trouble at SA (478 Views) Rich Curtis 03/15/2019 11:19AM
Re: more trouble at SA (453 Views) BB 03/15/2019 12:38PM
Re: more trouble at SA (338 Views) philywheel 03/16/2019 11:49AM
Re: more trouble at SA (320 Views) Blueskies 03/16/2019 12:35PM
Re: more trouble at SA (316 Views) BB 03/16/2019 02:10PM
seems odd (370 Views) skitimber 03/16/2019 02:04PM
PS to seems odd: Oscar Barrera (472 Views) skitimber 03/16/2019 02:09PM
Re: PS to seems odd: Oscar Barrera (483 Views) TGJB 03/16/2019 02:32PM
Re: PS to seems odd: Oscar Barrera (417 Views) dennish 03/17/2019 07:57AM
Re: PS to seems odd: Oscar Barrera (361 Views) Boscar Obarra 04/01/2019 02:47PM
Re: more trouble at SA (469 Views) Blueskies 03/15/2019 12:47PM
Re: more trouble at SA (476 Views) BB 03/28/2019 11:15PM
Re: more trouble at SA (495 Views) Al Caught Up 03/14/2019 10:27PM
Re: more trouble at SA (468 Views) johnnym 03/15/2019 06:17PM
Re: more trouble at SA (417 Views) BitPlayer 03/31/2019 07:54PM
Re: more trouble at SA (373 Views) Blueskies 04/01/2019 01:24PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.