"Never carried 126 lbs before" (709 Views)
Posted by:
TreadHead (IP Logged)
Date: September 04, 2020 12:34PM
I keep seeing this talking point brought up every year, I know some people assert that a horse that has won all his races carrying 118-120 are "negatively impacted" when they have to carry 126 lbs (though mathematically this doesn't make much sense) and others would assert that the added weight doesn't have a negative impact on ability (other than the TG computed relative weight difference, of course).
Has anyone ever done a fact-based study of figures to prove (or disprove) either assertion? Do horses carrying 126 for the first time run worse TG numbers?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.