Tavasco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Socalman3 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Did you mean the 10th? The Silks Run?
>
> Yessir, I did mean the 10th race, not the 11th as
> I referenced.
>
> I am not attuned to the pharmacology of the
> backside, but the point you make about a Lasix
> substitute makes sense to me. Further, I suppose
> testing will always be playing catch-up.
>
> I'll keep my eye on this trainer in the context of
> your comments. - Thanks

There could be other pharmacological explanations going on -- it is 6 year old with 20 races under its girth running its two fastest races as a 6 year old -- I was only noting that until this year and this trainer, this horse was clearly one that ran better on lasix than off it and then all of a sudden that changed. More than one thing can be going on at a time.