Re: Baffert redux (520 Views)
Posted by:
Fairmount1 (IP Logged)
Date: April 28, 2022 10:22PM
Rez,
One thing I've wondered is why the Baffert camp was against the in person Maylin depo in a KHRC matter? The judge said In Person will be allowed as I understand it.
Some may recall a Times Union article I posted a while back that had lengthy info about Maylin. It likely was dismissed as propaganda that is trying to tear down racing. That aside, here is what I recall. . . that Maylin has a long list of frozen samples that he just can't figure out why there is something not quite right with them.
Depo Q Number 2 after Name, address, occupation, etc.: Dr. Maylin, are any of those samples that you can't identify what's not quite right ones that are from horses that were trained by Mr. Baffert?
Baffert Camp: OBJECTION OBJECTION OBJECTION. . . . .
________________________________
From the article:
[size=medium][i]The 81-year-old scientist with tidy white hair pulled open the vault-like door to his freezer and revealed floor-to-ceiling rows of preserved samples — over 500 vials of blood and urine in clear tubes the length of a finger. Each was drawn from a racehorse and has been set aside because it contains a peculiar, as-yet-unknown substance. Maylin is working and waiting for the day when he has the right test or technology to identify each one.
“Some samples are 10 years old,” he said, closing the door and plunging the mystery samples back into darkness. He’ll keep them until he runs out of space.[/i][/size]