As good of a time as any to cite an article from Paulick Report where Kevin Mullally stated once upon a time a few things of note:

https://paulickreport.com/nl-list/wagering-insecurity-thoroughbred-idea-foundation-to-examine-current-state-of-oversight
____________________________________

"Automated bingo card devices in church basements have more independent monitoring than the tote systems."

and

"Tote systems that have been used in America lack the clear lines of accountability and defined processes to independently validate the technology. Moreover, they lack proper safeguards to independently investigate a malfunction, or investigate attempts to compromise the system."

and from the same article,

Track operators seem indifferent. As one 25-year U.S. state racing regulator told TIF for this series:

“Most tracks, confronted with a wagering integrity issue, would either bury the information or bury their heads in the sand and it would never see the light of day. That’s not every track across America, but the majority would not want to make public any information that would question the integrity of wagering on their product.�

In 2005, when speaking of the racing industry’s post “Fix Six� efforts to upgrade wagering oversight which eventually failed, then Del Mar Thoroughbred Club President Craig Fravel acknowledged the track operators might fall short of the mark.

“We [track operators] are a little suspect because we are maybe overly confident at times. I think to allow customers to have sufficient levels of confidence in us, we have to not only demonstrate we are capable of reviewing things, but that there is a sufficiently independent and authoritative organization out there than can be the ultimate arbiter of those kind of decisions.�

Such a group still does not exist.