Re: McPeek Got F&#KED Yesterday. Inside Job- Mystik Dan Now OUT (259 Views)
Posted by: P-Dub (IP Logged)
Date: November 07, 2025 01:08AM
Silver Charm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So are to the point where we need to start
> handicapping the Vets? Ask anyone who is a
> Professional Gambler that is part of a heavy
> wagering syndicate and bets Pro Football.
>
> The Kansas City Chiefs had never lost a game where
> Clay Martin was Lead Official. Certain NBA Refs
> the game almost always goes OVER. They call more
> Fouls. Professionals study this. If one Vet
> eyeballs more scratches than the others then
> that's important info if you are playing multi
> race wagers. While some of this sounds ridiculous
> that is where we are at. NO ONE KNOWS the
> standards or the rules. Its one mysterious mans
> judgement.....
KC is 6-0 and 3-3 ATS with Martin, one of those wins a squeaker against an awful Raiders team as a DD favorite. The Chiefs have been great, the Raiders have been @#$%&. A 6 game sample with the far better team beating the shitty one 6 straight isn't significant.
Your NBA assertion isn't close to accurate. There isn't one NBA Ref that "almost always goes OVER". Yes, some have Over or Under tendencies. Not one of them is anywhere close to almost always.
Are referee stats useful?? Sure they are, I have a few in my database. But they play a smaller role than people think
P-Dub
-------------------------------------------------------
> So are to the point where we need to start
> handicapping the Vets? Ask anyone who is a
> Professional Gambler that is part of a heavy
> wagering syndicate and bets Pro Football.
>
> The Kansas City Chiefs had never lost a game where
> Clay Martin was Lead Official. Certain NBA Refs
> the game almost always goes OVER. They call more
> Fouls. Professionals study this. If one Vet
> eyeballs more scratches than the others then
> that's important info if you are playing multi
> race wagers. While some of this sounds ridiculous
> that is where we are at. NO ONE KNOWS the
> standards or the rules. Its one mysterious mans
> judgement.....
KC is 6-0 and 3-3 ATS with Martin, one of those wins a squeaker against an awful Raiders team as a DD favorite. The Chiefs have been great, the Raiders have been @#$%&. A 6 game sample with the far better team beating the shitty one 6 straight isn't significant.
Your NBA assertion isn't close to accurate. There isn't one NBA Ref that "almost always goes OVER". Yes, some have Over or Under tendencies. Not one of them is anywhere close to almost always.
Are referee stats useful?? Sure they are, I have a few in my database. But they play a smaller role than people think
P-Dub
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
