I have all of the posts on this subject & have to share what I consider a comparison:
When I buy a used car (claiming it so to speak), you can get a full history of everything associated with it - accidents (requiring layoffs so to speak), service history (shoes, Lasix, blinkers, surgeries), and previous owners.

Using that comparison, I'm in JohnyM's camp. CAWs a bigger concern to me. The report published in Paulick says Gramm had info available to no one else. This is false. If it existeed, someone had access.
Fairmount, where am I going the wrong way here? Value your opinion, as all others.