Re: Saarland report (1085 Views)
Posted by:
teekay (IP Logged)
Date: May 06, 2002 01:52PM
I agree what's with the bone chips ?saarland finished on the bit although 15 lenghts or so behind the winner ,who in fact had bone chips himself ,that's why Walden passed on the horse .You want a reason why the horse lost ,no pace ,no adjustment .Saarland probably have lost anyway but he could have been closer