Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Suggestion (898 Views)
Posted by: Treadhead (IP Logged)
Date: May 23, 2002 01:15AM

Wow, I don't know if everyone on that other board is just dillusional, but I am just astonished at the lack of logic involved in any of the arguments made for the other camp.

Point 1:
In a post I'm sure will soon be taken down, one reader wonders why TG and Rags differ and is answered by JR's whimsical comment that TG "blew it" by having a 7 point jump in the SPT race that didn't result in a bounce. Yet the rags numbers have him moving up 5.5 points in the same race and then not bouncing (actually progressing) in the derby either. So by his logic, rags blew it just as much. Would you ever expect less of a bounce off a 5.5 move than a 7 pt move? I sure wouldn't

Point 2:
TENPINS!!!! If there has ever been a more glaring advertisement for TG, just compare the 2 products on this horse. TG has him (from memory) going 7, 5, 3 coming into his last race. Very playable. Rags has him at 11, 10, 1 going in, about as big a bounce candidate as you can have (especially according to JR, LOL). No wonder they are dishing out drug accusations like porn leaflets on the Vegas strip, if horses look like this on their product, no wonder.

Point 3:
In a lower-down thread about Sarava, Robes answers a wise crack about variants by implying that TG makes their figures according to what fits into the sheet and doesn't use care in variants at all. But JB's #1 argument the whole time is that THEY are not taking enough care with variants, that tracks change during the day and you can't use the same one all day and is challanging the extents they use to come up with them? Is Friedman senile? Is he so dense that he does not understand the TG argument?

Look, I'm just some schmuck from Ohio who wants to make money. I think determining who is making the better figures is important to that goal, I don't understand people who don't see any use in figuring out whose are better. But since people over there can't even make sensible arguments as to why TG is a "knockoff" and what Rags is doing better, I guess it's hard to know what's going on in any of their heads. Good luck to all, looking forward to some other views.



Subject Written By Posted
Suggestion (1580 Views) HP 05/22/2002 07:35PM
Re: Suggestion (949 Views) bryan teel 05/22/2002 08:38PM
Re: Suggestion (1011 Views) TGJB 05/22/2002 08:40PM
Re: Suggestion (1019 Views) bryan teel 05/22/2002 09:49PM
Re: Suggestion (1030 Views) Scott V 05/22/2002 11:27PM
Re: Suggestion (1022 Views) bryan teel 05/23/2002 12:14AM
Re: Suggestion (898 Views) Treadhead 05/23/2002 01:15AM
Re: What Discussion? (945 Views) Mall 05/23/2002 01:38PM
Re: What Discussion? (957 Views) Alydar in California 05/23/2002 07:24PM
Re: Suggestion (940 Views) HP 05/23/2002 12:06PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.