David Patent wrote:
>
> >
> Right and wrong. I generally favor an open policy. However,
> what I have witnessed time and time again on the Rag. board
> from TG supporters are unsigned conclusory churlish rants and
> personal attacks, so I can't say that I'm all that surprised
> at their policy. Additionally, the Rag./TG debate is sort of
> like Evolution vs. Creationism. Either you believe one or
> the other and Creationists tend not to be persuaded by facts
> so what's the point of debating the point further?
>
>

TG--Wow. I guess you haven't noticed any unsigned conclusory churlish rants and personal attacks by raggies here, huh. I'm not surprised at their policy either, but for entirely different reasons--it's what they're all about. But the question is not whether we're surprised, but whether it's right to do it, and what inferences should be drawn from the fact they do it.



TGJB