Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
More Ragozin Logic (1110 Views)
Posted by: Treadhead (IP Logged)
Date: May 25, 2002 12:23PM
Alydar, you stole the thought right out of my head before I even had a chance to write it...
Jason L said: "But at least with Ragozin, I have some comfort that the numbers are based on a consistent scientific foundation and not one person's opinion."
As Alydar already said, there is no scientific basis for assuming a track stays the same for an entire card, even under "normal" conditions. This is just one man's opinion, nothing the least bit scientific about it.
In fact, a hypothesis that tracks do change daily carries MORE scientific weight. Are you saying there is no such thing as evaporation? Or that water trucks are always able to replenish the EXACT same amount of water between races that has evaporated since the last watering? That the exact same amount of moisture is introduced every time the track is harrowed? To me, this is sceintifically ridiculous, expecting that to all stay the same. So much for your "scientific" argument.
I swear, some of these raggies need to go back and take debate classes, provide facts with your arguments, not opinions or rhetoric! Here are some of my other recenet faves:
TG: Delaware valley numbers on rags are too slow. (3 examples from preakness day sited)
Patent: No they aren't, I make money with them all the time (no examples sited)
Hmmmm, who is more credible here?
(?? on sheets board): Why are TG and sheets numbers so different?
Jim: Because TG is a "knockoff" product. (no factual backup provided)
And raggies are less prone to personal attacks? You have got to be kidding me. JB is right, more raggies that post here the better. They show a fine example of the caliber of people using their product.
Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1914 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/23/2002 11:48PM |
Challenge (1058 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 12:18PM |
Re: Challenge (1079 Views)
|
nunzio |
05/24/2002 01:33PM |
Re: Challenge (1008 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 01:39PM |
Re: Challenge (1010 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 03:53PM |
Re: Challenge (1045 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 04:38PM |
Re: Challenge (1022 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 06:06PM |
Re: Challenge (1007 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 06:33PM |
Re: Challenge (1117 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 10:21PM |
Re: Challenge (1156 Views)
|
Anonymous User |
05/25/2002 01:02PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1190 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 05:40PM |
Challenge (1012 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 06:17PM |
HP, another hypocrite (1015 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/24/2002 07:17PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (999 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 07:36PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1017 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/24/2002 07:49PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1031 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 10:16PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1088 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/26/2002 01:12PM |
Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1037 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/26/2002 03:36PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1030 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/27/2002 07:22AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1043 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/27/2002 03:48PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1059 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/27/2002 05:57PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1019 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/27/2002 07:40PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1051 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/29/2002 11:32AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1060 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 09:36AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1011 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:29PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1048 Views)
|
HP |
05/27/2002 05:09PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1096 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 09:04PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1098 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/25/2002 09:26AM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1058 Views)
|
HP |
05/25/2002 12:18PM |
More Ragozin Logic (1110 Views) |
Treadhead |
05/25/2002 12:23PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1144 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/25/2002 05:17PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1072 Views)
|
Mall |
05/28/2002 12:27AM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1106 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/28/2002 03:29PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1077 Views)
|
Jason R. Litt |
05/24/2002 10:54PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1109 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/25/2002 05:20PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (983 Views)
|
Anonymous User |
05/25/2002 12:07PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|