Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Re: David, David, David. (1092 Views)
Posted by: TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: May 29, 2002 08:16PM
They used the same variant (roughly) as the other sprints--not as the Preakness. See my reply to Friedman.
1) You don't read very carefully, or to be more precise, are very selective about choosing what points to reply to. Your posts say a lot more about you than they do about me or the subject.
2) You ain't kiddin'.
3) Please think. Do you think it's likely she really won with a 19? If you blindly accept their figures as right, what's the point of discussing figure making at all?
4) Historical data on what? Until someone comes up with a machine to measure moisture content, rate of drying, and its effect on time of racehorses, the only way you can do it is by looking at the past figures of the horses. That's why we all do it this way. By the way, it looks like they actually have the grass course getting SLOWER that day. What do you make of that?
5) It's not about running well or not (as you again fail to answer directly, and attempt to recast the argument), it's about their chances of going back 6 POINTS OR MORE, or RUNNING 6 POINTS WORSE THAN THEIR TOPS. And you know it. I repeat--take me up on my bet. In any event, now that you know they were sliding the variant, do you still think they should have tied it to the Preakness?
6) As I just said, in this forum they clam up--they don't want an open dialogue. As you have seen in the posts from the lunatic fringe (Jim, Howard Dennis, etc., who unlike the Ragozin office don't realize how this stuff plays) there is a lot of really poisonous stuff out there about us, and me. Guess where it came from? I'll give you a hint--who would have a motive?
TGJB
Last Words? (2290 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/28/2002 10:51PM |
Didn't we already talk science? (1300 Views)
|
Treadhead |
05/29/2002 12:10AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1200 Views)
|
JimP |
05/29/2002 12:33AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1109 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 12:43AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1144 Views)
|
Treadhead |
05/29/2002 01:11AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1091 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:27PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1198 Views)
|
Mall |
05/29/2002 02:12AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1199 Views)
|
tegger |
05/29/2002 03:39AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1156 Views)
|
Mark O'Keeffe |
05/29/2002 04:58AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1194 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 08:23AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1215 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 04:28PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1170 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 05:02PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1067 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 05:35PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1123 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 06:11PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1128 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 07:18PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1163 Views)
|
JimP |
05/29/2002 07:37PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1092 Views) |
TGJB |
05/29/2002 08:16PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1086 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/30/2002 12:48AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1152 Views)
|
teekay |
06/03/2002 08:17PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1210 Views)
|
mandown |
05/29/2002 09:58PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1120 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/30/2002 12:25AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1069 Views)
|
mandown |
05/30/2002 02:46AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1201 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/30/2002 03:48AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1187 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/30/2002 09:29AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1179 Views)
|
Patrick Morgan |
05/29/2002 05:03PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1151 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 05:15PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1134 Views)
|
Patrick Morgan |
05/29/2002 05:38PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1207 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/30/2002 10:25PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1220 Views)
|
Mall |
05/30/2002 10:48PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1097 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 12:02AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1181 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 03:37AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1259 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 07:25AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1099 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 07:30AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1148 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 12:42PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1202 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 12:45PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1121 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 12:50PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1263 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 01:16PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1110 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 04:41PM |
Re: jerry (1251 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 05:34PM |
Re: jerry (1123 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 05:56PM |
Re: jerry (1116 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/31/2002 06:02PM |
Re: jerry (1167 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 06:20PM |
Re: jerry (1187 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 06:32PM |
Re: jerry (1075 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 06:55PM |
Re: jerry (1159 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 07:35PM |
Re: jerry (1076 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 08:33PM |
Re: jerry (1052 Views)
|
Jason L. |
05/31/2002 09:44PM |
Re: jerry (1146 Views)
|
Michael D. |
05/31/2002 10:05PM |
Re: jerry (1204 Views)
|
Jason L. |
05/31/2002 10:34PM |
Re: jerry (1145 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 11:06PM |
Re: endless bitchy catfights (1159 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
06/01/2002 07:21AM |
Re: jerry (1169 Views)
|
Jason L. |
06/01/2002 08:32PM |
Re: jerry (1217 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/02/2002 04:13PM |
Re: jerry (1321 Views)
|
Jason L. |
06/03/2002 07:40PM |
Bill Clinton Medallion of Merit (1262 Views)
|
Anonymous User |
06/01/2002 03:15AM |
Re: jerry (1146 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 08:27PM |
David: Two More Things To Think About (1124 Views)
|
Mall |
05/31/2002 08:42PM |
Re: David: Two More Things To Think About (1039 Views)
|
BrettFavre |
05/31/2002 09:34PM |
Re: David: Two More Things To Think About (1136 Views)
|
tgab |
05/31/2002 10:20PM |
Re: David: Two More Things To Think About (1109 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 11:04PM |
Re: jerry (1196 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 06:12PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1147 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 04:07PM |
Re: alydar (1193 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 04:37PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1127 Views)
|
Patrick Morgan |
06/03/2002 11:53PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1147 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
06/04/2002 07:37AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1070 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:15PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1073 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:10PM |
track speed (1158 Views)
|
nunzio |
05/29/2002 11:37AM |
Re: Last Words? (951 Views)
|
HP |
05/29/2002 01:20PM |
Re: Last Words? (1158 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 05:50PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|