Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Interesting point of discussion in ROTW analysis (1934 Views)
Posted by: derby1592 (IP Logged)
Date: March 10, 2002 02:48PM

In this weeks ROTW analysis was the following interesting statement:

"It’s highly doubtful Repent will back up here but he is getting down to levels which are exorbitantly fast for young 3yr-olds. His pattern does not lead one to project a bounce at all but the sheer performance level itself may be too fast for his good and may cause a reaction because he’s not physically capable of withstanding the stress induced by such big efforts. Again, his pattern doesn’t lead to that speculation, the performance level does."

Particularly interesting are the words, "his pattern doesn’t lead to that speculation, the performance level does."

This raises all sorts of questions.

At what performance level (if any) do you start to expect a reaction even with a strong pattern?

Are there some "constants" that even the fastest, fittest, and strongest horses cannot exceed (regardless of pattern) without inducing a reaction?

Are those constants changing over time (I know that sounds like an oxymoron) as horses seem to be getting faster and faster at a younger age?

If such constants exist, what are those "dangerous" performance levels as a function of age, sex, surface, etc. Wouldn't it be useful to have a set of guidelines (not rules) to help in analyzing a horse like Repent?

In the past on this board, we have discussed some possible constants such as a negative number or three straight negative numbers for any horse, sub-6 for a 2yo, etc.

I would be interested in hearing other thoughts on similar constants along with any facts and data to back them up.

Chris



Subject Written By Posted
Interesting point of discussion in ROTW analysis (1934 Views) derby1592 03/10/2002 02:48PM
Re: Interesting point of discussion in ROTW analysis (1269 Views) HP 03/11/2002 11:04AM
Re: Interesting point of discussion in ROTW analysis (1326 Views) Treadhead 03/11/2002 12:36PM
Re: Interesting point of discussion in ROTW analysis (1348 Views) HP 03/11/2002 01:24PM
Re: Interesting point of discussion in ROTW analysis (1344 Views) Mark O'Keeffe 03/11/2002 03:11PM
Re: Interesting point of discussion in ROTW analysis (1268 Views) Excitable Boy 03/11/2002 04:05PM
Re: Interesting point of discussion in ROTW analysis (1305 Views) Mark O'Keeffe 03/11/2002 05:12PM
Re: Interesting point of discussion in ROTW analysis (1288 Views) bdhsheets 03/11/2002 11:05PM
Re: Interesting point of discussion in ROTW analysis (1355 Views) Mall 03/11/2002 04:10PM
Re: Interesting point of discussion in ROTW analysis (1336 Views) HP 03/11/2002 05:05PM
Re: Pace , Figures, etc. (1278 Views) Ian Meyers 03/12/2002 11:29AM
Re: Pace , Figures, etc. (1493 Views) derby1592 04/01/2002 11:02PM
Re: Pace , Figures, etc. (1255 Views) Scott 04/03/2002 03:41PM
Scott, more on your numbers please (1360 Views) Goofything 04/12/2002 05:40PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.