1. On the question of whether not responding to the letter is significant: I made allegations and sent transcripts with them--if my allegations were false (or if the transcripts didn't say what I said) don't you think they would have responded? You've seen them make wisecracks on their site about me(like Jake's crack that started this a couple of days ago ON THIS SUBJECT), yet they wouldn't respond if they were in a position to embarass me? They took the position they did because although leaving things unanswered was harmful, they had no choice, and at least 90% of their customers don't come to the websites, and so don't know about it.

2. Even if you ignore the above, using your own reasoning, you have no way of making a "determination"--yet you have held my response against me. Huh?

3. Those Rag posters you refer to who come here to do me damage--why do you think that is? Who would have a motive to spread the stories that are repeated here over and over? Do you see any TG players doing that? (I'm not talking about challenging numbers, picks, betting strategy or anything else that's on the record--that's fair game. Soup, I'm setting you up here--be careful.)

4. Think about why Ragozin doesn't sell online. He has the technology now--anyone can download samples when Friedman posts them. Could it be because he wants to keep that 90% away form my posts and Red Board Room?

5. You have characterized our marketing as negativity--completely untrue, in fact, 180 degrees off. Ragozin's in the field marketing is negativity, but only when I'm not in a position to respond--they ignore us on the web as a matter of strategy. We're the ones with the Red Board Room and Race of The Week--my use of Raggies here is to demonstrate what goes on daily, and counter it. That's why I encourage them to post.



TGJB