first of all, let me say that I'm a little uncomfortable w/you fantisizing about me, and cyberstalking me.
it's flattering, but also very creepy.

secondly, here's how I picture you:
drunk by the second race, screaming at the jockeys on tv, always concocting excuses, and subjecting everyone standing beside you to your arcane selection methods every time you happen to cash some 8/5.
the exact type of goof youbet gets me away from.
I guess you're pretty much like an angry, embittered cliff clavin(?) from Cheers.

now, on w/the quoting.....

"From a handicapping standpoint, your last posts show that you're so far behind that it's difficult to imagine how you're ever going to catch up"

who, exactly, am I 'so far behind'?
you haven't been able to produce a good opinion on 16 races to date.
like you told me earlier, the pga pros concern themselves w/results.
(this was right after you told me about the big exacta you WOULD HAVE had if only your horse had run well ---- after all, it's the horse, not that you picked the race badly...)
superfreakicus = 1400
mall, the excuser = 0 (very appropriate)

by the way, I notice that you seem to have no problem responding to every one of my torrent of posts.

". BTW, I bit on your suggestion to check out the other Bd "

and what suggestion would that be, o' drunken one?
why do I get the feeling you have endless conversations w/me inside your head?

sincerely,

the man who "selected" a mare in foal to win a major stakes.