a sheets theory question: relevant to "Willa on the move" among others. A horse who shows an op- (4 back) and yesterday took up severely (big T) gets a figure on the effort made during the rest of the race. Why do both sheet figure makers refuse to improve the figure by estimating the trouble? I do not want to hear that you can not quantify the amount of trouble so you leave it out of the figure.

You pride yourself on such highly accurate figures that 1/4 to 1/2 point incremental improvements plus appropriate spacing may yield an "explosive" situation. Yet the failure to measure an op- or t or T renders the figure meaningless, when it may be the key to the horses whole line (and future reads).

I have no clue as to Willa's trouble 4 races back (off poor 1-2-3-4-5 lengths?). And if I am supposed to take such extensive trip notes so that I can modify the figures, why would I want to pay for such an inaccurate figure?? And how am I supposed to monitor so many tracks and races in this manner.

It seems to me that you can improve your figures by making them more accurately reflect the totality of the horses effort.

If you can post her sheet after yesterday's fig is inserted it may make for a intersesting discussion of her line if the first op- is viewed as a 1 or a 2 and Saturday's fig is also adjusted 2 points better for her early trouble.