Re: ROTW - from TG (1320 Views)
Posted by:
Jim (IP Logged)
Date: April 21, 2002 10:32AM
Uh HP, somehow my point seems to be totally escaping the homers - I supported the analysis. Can it get any more clearer?
I lost the race - I played him to lose. Is any of this getting through?
Now your comment - somehow I think 5/2 was based on Officer in the race. That doesn't change the fact that I basically agreed with the analysis...starting to sink in yet?
Sorry that's as far as I'm going. I'm not a butt kisser. BTW, Dianehill at 5-2 was a gift. I had her at least 3 points better - the only unknown was the first time turfer that ran 2nd at a price.