Interesting thought about Figure methodology (1345 Views)
Posted by:
Goofything (IP Logged)
Date: April 22, 2002 06:34PM
JB, you talk about Ragz methodology maybe being somewhat flawed here and there. What would happen if you somehow convinced him that you were right and he should adjust his methodologies somehow.
Wouldn't that screw up at least 4 years worth of data?
Wouldn't you then be comparing apples to oranges with newly adjusted numbers comparing to legacy numbers?
Wouldn't he then have to go back and spend countless man hours retesting all of his current thinking about patterns, etc?
Just curious how you would go about implementing changes into number calculations? Is it a regular occurence for you to continually tweak your numbers? I understand that you would always want to produce the most accurate number, but I'm just wondering if it's feasible?