You're obviously emotional attached to this discussion, so I'll just let it be. JB and others have shown the holes in your logic, but you're going to spend 10,000 words continuing to prove your point.

Dumbing it down and other insults add nothing to your poor logic. You're the only one that needs glasses for this discussion, but you continue to squint.

Last thing. You say the old results are irrelevant, because SA has "new dirt". You then try to make your point by using the example of a sprinter/miler. If you're going to discount the "old dirt", and specifically target the "new dirt", then your sample size is pretty small.

Good luck with your wagers.

P-Dub