Re: Stuck in the middle with you... (694 Views)
Posted by:
TreadHead (IP Logged)
Date: April 22, 2014 04:52PM
TGJB, I appreciate the the supporting details you provide to your opinions, something sorely missing from most other assertions out there. I'm surprised more people didn't jump on the post yesterday questioning the VIT # and saying he completely disagreed with it, while providing no supporting reasoning at all other than "WooHoo! CC is so awesome!"
My favorite part of MIFFs "zero science" post was how he started out saying there was zero science and then 2 paragraphs later was claiming he can tell a figure is wrong to the same level of certainty that 1+1=3 is wrong, which is 100% rooted in science.
Also entertaining to read that saying a figure is "not reflective" of what actually happened and saying a figure is "wrong" are apparently 2 entirely different statements.
To each his own, indeed