Re: Stuck in the middle with you... (694 Views)
Posted by:
TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: April 22, 2014 05:12PM
Seriously? You're going to defend that?
You made a statement that there was a cause and effect relationship. Even with 10 times the sample size it would be silly to do any more than put it forward as a thesis. In this case, with the first two being his first two starts AND a clear pattern, with a bounce where you would expect one, it's not just a silly assertion-- there's NO reason to believe it's true. It's less than 50/50, at best a possibility.