There were many errors noted in note. I could respond, and correct, and clarify, but I choose not to, other than to respond with Robert Kennedy quote "There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why ... I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?"

The amazing thing is people have choices, and the ability to voice/publish their dis-satisfaction with something, if something is not working as good as it should be --- even if it has continued to exist and go on for a long time beforehand. If an Allemeuse occurrence can happen, if a corrupt racing outfit can be allowed to continue to bilk an unsuspecting public, aided and abetted by a regulatory group that chooses to look the other way, despite being given evidence to that fact, if a betting pool gets shut down 2 minutes earlier than it should have by the regulatory group involved, and that doesn't include the weekly/monthly/yearly changes in judgement concerning what the regulatory group saw, or didn't see, which profoundly calls into question the ability of the regulatory group to properly oversee anything.