Re: Belmont possibles (505 Views)
Posted by:
P-Dub (IP Logged)
Date: May 19, 2015 09:12PM
ringato3 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> P-Dub,
>
> Moving on. You missed my point. Perhaps I didn't
> write it clearly enough. Not criticizing your
> picks. actually the opposite. Citing your style
> of play. with your style of play, as I can
> discern from your posts, you are always looking
> for prices. As such not sure why you feel
> inclined to jump on the anti-Upstart,
> anti-Materiality bandwagon, after the fact, when
> they were both very fast horses with a right to
> win, at double digit odds, with both being faster
> than the favorite.
>
> Me thinks if AP was an east coast horse, you
> wouldn't have posted at all. But that is just
> me.
>
> Rob
I completely missed your point, my apologies.
As for after the fact comments about those 2 horses, I posted I liked Firing Line. Posted 10 min or so before post time. I said the others didn't have to fire their best shot, I think it's reasonable to infer I didn't like either Mat/Up based on a) the comment about the others not firing and b) playing a horse lower in odds despite being "slower". That's hardly an after the fact comment.
As for the east coast comment, I'll just say you are wrong and leave it at that.
P-Dub