Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (627 Views)
Posted by: miff (IP Logged)
Date: September 25, 2015 01:56PM

DRF

Audit raises concerns over New York OTBs’ financial situations

By Matt Hegarty


New York lawmakers should examine the statutory requirements imposed on the state’s five offtrack betting corporations with the intent of shoring up their deteriorating financial condition, according to the recommendations of an audit by the New York state comptroller’s office examining the OTBs’ operations over the past five years.

The audit, released on Friday, called the financial viability of the five corporations “questionable,” citing across-the-board declines in handle, operating revenue, and contributions to local governments. It recommended that the state legislature reconsider the formulas contained in state laws requiring payments to the state’s racing industry, particularly to in-state harness tracks.

“Given the significant amount of ‘upfront’ payments the corporations must make to the racing industry and governments in an environment of declining handle, the corporations may have trouble reducing expenses enough to ensure their long-term viability without legislative action,” the report said.

New York’s OTB corporations have long faced financial problems as more handle migrates away from brick-and-mortar locations to Internet and mobile wagering operations. In 2010, the state’s largest OTB corporation, New York City OTB, went bankrupt, and both OTB corporations on Long Island have struggled significantly with their own financial problems.

According to the audit, total handle at the five OTB companies declined 19 percent from 2009 to 2013, and “the downward trend is continuing,” the audit said. Total handle on horse racing in the U.S. declined 11.4 percent during the same period. Operating revenue for the five companies declined at an even greater rate, by 24 percent, over the same period, while operating expenses declined only 9 percent.

Distributions to local governments declined 42 percent over the same period, according to the audit, to $10.2 million from $17.6 million. All five OTB corporations are owned by the counties in which they operate, and all net profits are distributed to the localities.

The audit raised specific concerns about payments made to in-state harness tracks under a “hold harmless” clause in a state law passed in 2003 that allowed the OTBs to take nighttime simulcast signals from other tracks. The audit said that officials from one of the corporations, Capital OTB, stated that it paid the Saratoga harness track $2.5 million annually under the law from wagers that generated net revenue of $300,000 for the OTB.

“The costs the corporations have to bear under this law significantly outweigh the benefits received,” the audit said.

The audit also points out that the OTBs have been paying far higher rates for some simulcast signals over the past five years. During that time frame, many racetracks have pressed simulcast sites to pay higher rates as leverage in the market has shifted to tracks that have highly attractive simulcast products and to collectives of tracks that have banded together to increase their market power during simulcast negotiations.



Subject Written By Posted
Racing Don't Need This! (1368 Views) miff 09/10/2015 08:29AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (787 Views) johnnym 09/10/2015 09:55AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (702 Views) miff 09/10/2015 10:09AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (778 Views) Topcat 09/10/2015 10:20AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (605 Views) metroj 09/10/2015 11:51AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (710 Views) Topcat 09/10/2015 12:00PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (633 Views) jerry 09/10/2015 12:51PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (696 Views) rezlegal 09/10/2015 08:10PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (672 Views) jbelfior 09/10/2015 09:15PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (709 Views) Fairmount1 09/10/2015 10:04PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (599 Views) BitPlayer 09/10/2015 11:28PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (631 Views) Topcat 09/11/2015 10:11AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (658 Views) ringato3 09/11/2015 10:53AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (837 Views) TGJB 09/11/2015 10:55AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (625 Views) HP 09/11/2015 11:51AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (569 Views) moosepalm 09/11/2015 09:53PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (553 Views) Holybull1 09/12/2015 04:09AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (533 Views) pizzalove 09/12/2015 08:37AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (460 Views) Topcat 09/12/2015 08:43AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (561 Views) P-Dub 09/11/2015 05:50AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (570 Views) miff 09/11/2015 09:57AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (506 Views) P-Dub 09/11/2015 12:30PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (579 Views) richiebee 09/11/2015 01:16PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (553 Views) jerry 09/12/2015 01:53AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (512 Views) richiebee 09/12/2015 09:26AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (667 Views) Topcat 09/12/2015 10:55AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (564 Views) miff 09/12/2015 11:26AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (511 Views) bellsbendboy 09/12/2015 11:43AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (573 Views) jerry 09/13/2015 12:51PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (561 Views) richiebee 09/13/2015 08:44PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (650 Views) TGJB 09/13/2015 10:05PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (521 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 05:56AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (605 Views) jerry 09/13/2015 11:20PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (701 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 05:45AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (610 Views) moosepalm 09/14/2015 08:32AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (462 Views) jerry 09/14/2015 10:52AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (625 Views) TGJB 09/14/2015 11:42AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (535 Views) Topcat 09/14/2015 12:17PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (548 Views) P-Dub 09/14/2015 04:40AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (532 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 05:54AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (514 Views) Edgorman 09/14/2015 08:02AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (519 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 10:54AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (552 Views) P-Dub 09/14/2015 01:06PM
Canterbury (627 Views) Fairmount1 09/14/2015 09:42PM
Re: Canterbury (624 Views) mjellish 09/15/2015 12:10AM
Re: Canterbury (546 Views) miff 09/15/2015 08:31AM
Re: Canterbury (595 Views) TGJB 09/15/2015 12:40PM
Re: Canterbury (540 Views) Gerard 09/15/2015 01:25PM
Re: Canterbury (506 Views) banditbeau 09/15/2015 10:39PM
Re: Canterbury (511 Views) miff 09/16/2015 07:54AM
Re: Canterbury (447 Views) Rick B. 09/16/2015 09:03AM
Re: Canterbury (489 Views) miff 09/16/2015 09:41AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (581 Views) Holybull1 09/11/2015 09:36AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (578 Views) jbelfior 09/11/2015 10:38AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (623 Views) Topcat 09/11/2015 02:23PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (704 Views) miff 09/11/2015 03:18PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (467 Views) belmont3 09/11/2015 10:46PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (502 Views) miff 09/12/2015 07:50AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (593 Views) jma11473 09/12/2015 08:21AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (535 Views) johnnym 09/12/2015 08:37AM
Survey says.............. (647 Views) Breakage 09/12/2015 12:28PM
Re: Survey says.............. (556 Views) Breakage 09/12/2015 12:43PM
Re: Survey says.............. (567 Views) Boscar Obarra 09/12/2015 01:51PM
Some data on fantasy sports and percent of winners (562 Views) Breakage 09/15/2015 07:27PM
Nominal take out 5%-25%-effective take out 50% for 98.3% of players (632 Views) Breakage 09/16/2015 04:55PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (627 Views) miff 09/25/2015 01:56PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (775 Views) P-Dub 09/10/2015 12:40PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (523 Views) asfufh 09/12/2015 10:17AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (560 Views) miff 09/22/2015 11:10AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (515 Views) jbelfior 09/22/2015 02:54PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (586 Views) Boscar Obarra 09/22/2015 04:15PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (609 Views) jma11473 09/22/2015 05:34PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (589 Views) TGJB 09/22/2015 05:43PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (580 Views) miff 09/22/2015 07:28PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (539 Views) Boscar Obarra 09/22/2015 07:57PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (539 Views) Fairmount1 09/15/2015 06:50PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (661 Views) miff 09/16/2015 10:15AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (384 Views) jp702006 09/16/2015 11:18AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (518 Views) Michael D. 09/16/2015 11:57AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (512 Views) Gerard 09/16/2015 12:11PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (538 Views) richiebee 09/16/2015 12:15PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (520 Views) miff 09/16/2015 12:22PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (702 Views) TGJB 09/16/2015 06:47PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (454 Views) gteasy 09/23/2015 12:17AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.