I think the write up is excellent, easy reading, comprehensive and understandable.

A couple of thoughts I couldn't get out of my head.

1) [u]What is so magical about three.[/u] Why do we so often see three horse exacta boxes. In this race I like including a fourth to the tickets.

2) [u]Which horses look to have the potential to crash the analysis.[/u] Considering [b]Royal Albert Hall[/b] is borderline and [b]Finnegan's Wake's[/b] last was weak, one or both can be considered beatable. [b]Montego Bay[/b] @ 10/1 c/b one. The distance mitigates his late closing style for me

3) [u]Why does [i]Shirreffs[/i] want [b]Blingo[/b] in this race?[/u] His big dirt #'s back in 2014 are seductive. His last race improvement encourages. Trainers marginally profitable ROI Dirt to Turf and it is his best category. Yet not standout. I know the horse has no turf success.

Consequently I'm adding a fourth horse to my exacta and trifecta boxes in case I need to exclaim [b]Blingo![/b] at the finish Any scratchs and I'll substitute [b]MB[/b].