ok, wow, this has snowballed fast.....let me preface this by saying i am in no way trying to be disrespectful or a red boarder...
If i recall, and I could be dead wrong, is preakness day, you yourself called out a horse you guys had that won on turf with a fast last dirt number that you said jake had way slow..to me that was a cherry pick...then i responded with justin squared. If i initiated that, my apologies, but i dont think i did. But the bigger point I was trying to make is that playing the sheets for 20 years, and tg much less frequent, im pretty confident both have got races wrong. As far as saturday goes, again, i didnt mean to offend anyone, but KC looked how he looked and wasnt fastest on all numbers as was stated. From there it snowballed.I have stated here many times I have done well using Tg only. Really the only time you hear from me, is when someone with absolute certainty says how bad the sheets are. But ultimately, its your board, a TG board and I should just bite my tongue. As far as saturdays results go, yes there were good calls on the seminar. You did in fact get me on grand tito. And as i was stating saturday, its all about how you read patterns. Len liked calcualtor, i didnt. I liked stanford and amis flatter, not much better. I didnt care for justin squared either, but didnt come close in race. Lastly, ill add, im not sure if you have me confused with someone else or not, but I never have talked to jake...didnt talk about that race from preakness day, didnt post on their board regarding that race. Oh, id still like to dig into that SA race. Again, not to be disrespectful, but after reading countless ROW, and getting the last 8 or so seminars, where when horses are 4 points slower, you generally say horse is too slow. Im curious as to what that horse ran, and if you adjusted any previous numbers?...just trying to get as comfortable with tg as I am with sheets...