Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Re: Hollendorfer, SA, and Royal Ascot (917 Views)
Posted by: Fairmount1 (IP Logged)
Date: June 23, 2019 08:54AM
Jerry,
I know it isn't Lasix per se that makes a trainer move a horse up. But the horses and horsemen started scattering when they changed the med rule from 10cc of Lasix and all the anti-inflammatories you can find to 5cc of Lasix and no anti-inflammatories on race day. Miller, O'Neill, Hollendorfer, Mullins all took some of their horses elsewhere right away.
(That's right when Miller quit winning although he had a huge blowout win at CD at 12-1 this week to get some spending cash)
I think the higher Lasix dose and anti-inflammatories loaded up allowed whatever illicit pain killers or performance enhancers to be masked, diluted, go undetected, etc. You have stated that you haven't heard about masking in a few years. This is where you and I disagree though. The fact is clear that TSG changed the rule and horsemen and horses scattered like rats seeing sunshine for the first time in their lives. Surely the stricter drug rules were why they ran away, no?? And if so, isn't it logical to believe that whatever the super high percentage trainer was doing was necessitated on the 10cc Lasix and anti-inflammatories on race day to implement his "program" (that's what all these trainers call it) without being detected???
I'm not necessarily against Lasix to prevent bleeding. We all know Lasix is a performance enhancer and some must think "More is better." But if 5cc or lower quantity accomplishes the goal of preventing bleeding then that's what the rule should be. And as I said previously, I haven't heard complaints about horses bleeding due to the rule change out there. Now if only there could be uniformity at all tracks on this and other fronts...……
As FrankD is apt to say, Nero fiddles...
Hollendorfer (1408 Views)
|
Caradoc |
06/22/2019 07:35PM |
Re: Hollendorfer, SA, and Royal Ascot (1074 Views)
|
Fairmount1 |
06/22/2019 08:56PM |
Re: Hollendorfer, SA, and Royal Ascot (1207 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/22/2019 09:11PM |
Re: Hollendorfer, SA, and Royal Ascot (952 Views)
|
jerry |
06/23/2019 10:57AM |
Re: Hollendorfer, SA, and Royal Ascot (1025 Views)
|
Fairmount1 |
06/22/2019 09:20PM |
Re: Hollendorfer, SA, and Royal Ascot (1119 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/22/2019 11:14PM |
Re: Hollendorfer, SA, and Royal Ascot (921 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/22/2019 11:38PM |
Re: Hollendorfer, SA, and Royal Ascot (968 Views)
|
BB |
06/22/2019 11:59PM |
Re: Hollendorfer, SA, and Royal Ascot (917 Views) |
Fairmount1 |
06/23/2019 08:54AM |
Re: Trainers leaving California (882 Views)
|
BitPlayer |
06/23/2019 09:25AM |
Re: Hollendorfer, SA, and Royal Ascot (1008 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/23/2019 12:07PM |
Re: Hollendorfer, SA, and Royal Ascot (808 Views)
|
Blueskies |
07/01/2019 09:06AM |
Re: Hollendorfer (947 Views)
|
Mstrlucky74 |
06/22/2019 11:50PM |
Re: Hollendorfer (923 Views)
|
Topcat |
06/23/2019 08:27AM |
Re: Hollendorfer (1022 Views)
|
moosepalm |
06/23/2019 09:40AM |
Re: Hollendorfer (871 Views)
|
Al Caught Up |
06/23/2019 10:41AM |
Re: Hollendorfer (862 Views)
|
Rich Curtis |
06/23/2019 12:06PM |
Re: Hollendorfer (839 Views)
|
P-Dub |
06/30/2019 04:33PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|