Re: Breeders Cup Classic (411 Views)
Posted by:
HP (IP Logged)
Date: October 25, 2004 02:48PM
I agree. But...
The guy has a substantial track record here, and it's VERY bad. You could argue that it's all a coincidence, or he doesn't have the advantage of spotting his horses or whatever, but I DO have some faith in the numbers and the results don't make sense.
The other thing that doesn't make sense is that if you track his horses, if you had to make a single comment about Frankel, you would have to say "his horses HOLD THEIR FORM." They run their number EVERY time out. There isn't much of a "form cycle." How is it possible that, with few exceptions, they manage to poop out at the BC, right on schedule?
Don't most guys crank up for these races? Don't they schedule things to be ready on the big day? What could account for getting it wrong so often if it's not the quality of the horses going in (and it's NOT the quality of the horses going in)?
I don't believe that much in coincidence. I backed his horses last year, the ones that I thought had a chance, and this was in California, where he is no stranger. With my money off his back, he'll probably win every race...
HP