Re: Kela's BC Trip (461 Views)
Posted by:
Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: December 11, 2004 10:12PM
Two,
Michael is certainly not an idiot. I just don't think that helps the debate. He's got a different view or a different interpretation of the start I guess. Thats what makes for wagering opinions. He framed this debate on this board: "Is the figure divergence related to a ground loss error or is it related to the Rag interpretation of the start of the race." The next question is of course, "If the difference is related to starting gate interpretations is that explanation satisfactory?"
Post Edited (12-11-04 22:17)