Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024  • 2 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Racing Don't Need This! (1370 Views)
Posted by: miff (IP Logged)
Date: September 10, 2015 08:29AM

Bloodhorse:

NY Lawmakers Hear Views on Internet Poker

New York's racetrack-based casino operators are urging state officials to go slow with any effort to legalize online poker and, if permitted, any internet poker program should be awarded only to the racinos and other land-based gambling facilities licensed in the state.

"We're not here to say this will destroy racing or gaming as it exists. We are saying we should proceed carefully," James Featherstonhaugh, president of the New York Gaming Association, told lawmakers Sept. 9 during a Senate Racing and Wagering Committee hearing.

The hearing was called by Sen. John Bonacic, a Hudson Valley Republican who chairs the committee and is the sponsor of legislation introduced in May legalizing internet poker. The Bonacic bill does not limit online poker licenses to existing brick-and-mortar gambling facilities and it calls for a $10 million fee to be paid by the state in return for a 10-year license. There is no identical bill introduced yet in the Assembly and the administration of Gov. Andrew Cuomo has not yet advanced the issue either.

The racino trade group says New York's track-based casinos, which includes facilities at Aqueduct Racetrack and Finger Lakes Thoroughbred racetracks, provided nearly $900 million in revenue-sharing payments to the state last year and more than $5.5 billion since the first racino opened in 2004. Featherstonhaugh, an Albany lobbyist and part-owner of the Saratoga Casino and Raceway, said the state is the "senior partner" with existing racinos because of that revenue sharing arrangement and that Albany "needs to be aware of and sensitive to protecting" the funds that now flow from the track casinos.

New York is in the midst of an expansion of commercial casinos with real slot machines, unlike the video lottery terminals permitted at the racinos,as well as table games. The state on Sept. 10 is poised to approve regulations governing the operation of the new casinos, which sets the stage for the first three casino licenses to be awarded later this month. The state gaming commission has tentatively identified the first three sites in the southern Catskills, Schenectady, and the town of Tyre, which is located about a half-hour from Finger Lakes. A fourth is proposed for Tioga Downs racetrack, west of Binghamton, and three more licenses will not be awarded for at least several years. The commercial casino expansion was approved in a statewide referendum in 2013.

"We certainly think we should not move forward with online poker or any expansion of gaming until the three authorized and sited casinos... are open and doing business," Featherstonhaugh said.

Bonacic's panel heard from representatives of MGM Resorts International, Caesars, and the Borgata Hotel Casino in Atlantic City. All three provided a similar theme: internet poker is already being played by numerous New Yorkers in an unregulated environment, there is money to be had for Albany in embracing the online game, and state officials should consider more than just poker if it goes the internet gambling route.

"The internet is the future, not just for the gaming industry but for any industry," said John McManus, executive vice president and general counsel at MGM. He said having a "safe and regulated" online poker system in New York "makes all the sense in the world."

Despite introducing legislation to legalize online poker, Bonacic told the hearing's participants that he is still in a fact-finding mode on the issue, and he did not close the door to additional online games or to limiting future licenses for internet gambling to brick-and-mortar casinos and racinos licensed by the state.



Subject Written By Posted
Racing Don't Need This! (1370 Views) miff 09/10/2015 08:29AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (790 Views) johnnym 09/10/2015 09:55AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (704 Views) miff 09/10/2015 10:09AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (780 Views) Topcat 09/10/2015 10:20AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (607 Views) metroj 09/10/2015 11:51AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (711 Views) Topcat 09/10/2015 12:00PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (636 Views) jerry 09/10/2015 12:51PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (697 Views) rezlegal 09/10/2015 08:10PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (675 Views) jbelfior 09/10/2015 09:15PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (711 Views) Fairmount1 09/10/2015 10:04PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (599 Views) BitPlayer 09/10/2015 11:28PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (633 Views) Topcat 09/11/2015 10:11AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (661 Views) ringato3 09/11/2015 10:53AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (840 Views) TGJB 09/11/2015 10:55AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (627 Views) HP 09/11/2015 11:51AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (570 Views) moosepalm 09/11/2015 09:53PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (555 Views) Holybull1 09/12/2015 04:09AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (534 Views) pizzalove 09/12/2015 08:37AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (462 Views) Topcat 09/12/2015 08:43AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (562 Views) P-Dub 09/11/2015 05:50AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (571 Views) miff 09/11/2015 09:57AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (507 Views) P-Dub 09/11/2015 12:30PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (581 Views) richiebee 09/11/2015 01:16PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (555 Views) jerry 09/12/2015 01:53AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (513 Views) richiebee 09/12/2015 09:26AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (669 Views) Topcat 09/12/2015 10:55AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (565 Views) miff 09/12/2015 11:26AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (513 Views) bellsbendboy 09/12/2015 11:43AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (575 Views) jerry 09/13/2015 12:51PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (562 Views) richiebee 09/13/2015 08:44PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (651 Views) TGJB 09/13/2015 10:05PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (522 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 05:56AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (606 Views) jerry 09/13/2015 11:20PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (702 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 05:45AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (611 Views) moosepalm 09/14/2015 08:32AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (464 Views) jerry 09/14/2015 10:52AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (626 Views) TGJB 09/14/2015 11:42AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (536 Views) Topcat 09/14/2015 12:17PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (550 Views) P-Dub 09/14/2015 04:40AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (533 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 05:54AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (516 Views) Edgorman 09/14/2015 08:02AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (520 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 10:54AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (555 Views) P-Dub 09/14/2015 01:06PM
Canterbury (629 Views) Fairmount1 09/14/2015 09:42PM
Re: Canterbury (626 Views) mjellish 09/15/2015 12:10AM
Re: Canterbury (547 Views) miff 09/15/2015 08:31AM
Re: Canterbury (596 Views) TGJB 09/15/2015 12:40PM
Re: Canterbury (541 Views) Gerard 09/15/2015 01:25PM
Re: Canterbury (507 Views) banditbeau 09/15/2015 10:39PM
Re: Canterbury (513 Views) miff 09/16/2015 07:54AM
Re: Canterbury (449 Views) Rick B. 09/16/2015 09:03AM
Re: Canterbury (493 Views) miff 09/16/2015 09:41AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (583 Views) Holybull1 09/11/2015 09:36AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (579 Views) jbelfior 09/11/2015 10:38AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (624 Views) Topcat 09/11/2015 02:23PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (706 Views) miff 09/11/2015 03:18PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (468 Views) belmont3 09/11/2015 10:46PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (504 Views) miff 09/12/2015 07:50AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (594 Views) jma11473 09/12/2015 08:21AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (538 Views) johnnym 09/12/2015 08:37AM
Survey says.............. (648 Views) Breakage 09/12/2015 12:28PM
Re: Survey says.............. (557 Views) Breakage 09/12/2015 12:43PM
Re: Survey says.............. (569 Views) Boscar Obarra 09/12/2015 01:51PM
Some data on fantasy sports and percent of winners (563 Views) Breakage 09/15/2015 07:27PM
Nominal take out 5%-25%-effective take out 50% for 98.3% of players (633 Views) Breakage 09/16/2015 04:55PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (631 Views) miff 09/25/2015 01:56PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (776 Views) P-Dub 09/10/2015 12:40PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (523 Views) asfufh 09/12/2015 10:17AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (562 Views) miff 09/22/2015 11:10AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (516 Views) jbelfior 09/22/2015 02:54PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (588 Views) Boscar Obarra 09/22/2015 04:15PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (617 Views) jma11473 09/22/2015 05:34PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (590 Views) TGJB 09/22/2015 05:43PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (581 Views) miff 09/22/2015 07:28PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (540 Views) Boscar Obarra 09/22/2015 07:57PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (540 Views) Fairmount1 09/15/2015 06:50PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (663 Views) miff 09/16/2015 10:15AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (386 Views) jp702006 09/16/2015 11:18AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (519 Views) Michael D. 09/16/2015 11:57AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (515 Views) Gerard 09/16/2015 12:11PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (539 Views) richiebee 09/16/2015 12:15PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (522 Views) miff 09/16/2015 12:22PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (705 Views) TGJB 09/16/2015 06:47PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (456 Views) gteasy 09/23/2015 12:17AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.