Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Wood Day (360 Views)
Posted by: TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: April 12, 2005 05:34PM

Miff-- I wish I'd seen the "New York Bred Slow Rats" race in the book. I was looking for that condition for Northern Stealth.

The Aqu track Sat was faster by quite a bit than the one Friday (good to fast), but almost exactly the same speed as the ones Thu and Sunday, so I guess the question becomes, compared to what? The times looked fast due to some really fast horses running, and a large number of chute races that were sped up by the wind. Survivalist paired, everybody behind him ran well off their tops, Forest Danger ran a new top (sort of, more on that in a minute), Jerken's horse paired, Don Six went back. Lost In The Fog went back, Hushion's horse ran slightly worse than his top.

People underestimate how much effect wind can have, especially on fractions-- we'd have to run it through the computer, but my guess is you could add a second to the half for those 7f races, almost 2 seconds to the 6f in the miles, which wouldn't be that fast for the horses in question. The "rats" ran half a mile with the wind at their backs, and it helped them a little on the turn, hence the fast fraction and relatively fast final time.

As far as the possible wind shift, I'm having Litfin check, but if it was the other way those horses would get BETTER numbers. And, as I said, I took off a point or two early in the card anyway, just off looking at the horses.

Michael D-- as we discussed, doing that GP figure for Forest Danger was a bitch (track was clearly getting faster, turf race on either side, no more dirt races afterward), and when he ran faster this time I reviewed it. Given what several have come back to run since, I went with the other possible scenario, which basically gives FD a pair.



TGJB



Subject Written By Posted
Wood Day (676 Views) TGJB 04/11/2005 06:17PM
Re: Wood Day (365 Views) beyerguy 04/11/2005 06:24PM
Re: Wood Day (348 Views) P.Eckhart 04/11/2005 06:34PM
Re: Wood Day (356 Views) TGJB 04/11/2005 06:39PM
Re: Wood Day (365 Views) 04/11/2005 06:49PM
Re: Wood Day (365 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/11/2005 07:09PM
Re: Wood Day (358 Views) 04/11/2005 07:18PM
Re: Wood Day (390 Views) jimbo66 04/11/2005 07:29PM
Re: Wood Day (374 Views) 04/11/2005 07:36PM
Re: Wood Day (358 Views) Michael D. 04/11/2005 08:39PM
Re: Wood Day (382 Views) SJU5 04/11/2005 08:06PM
Re: Wood Day (359 Views) mandown 04/11/2005 08:58PM
Re: Wood Day (356 Views) SJU5 04/12/2005 02:12PM
Re: Wood Day (373 Views) TGJB 04/12/2005 02:38PM
Re: Wood Day (371 Views) SJU5 04/12/2005 03:23PM
Re: Wood Day (1516 Views) miff 04/12/2005 03:40PM
Re: Wood Day (360 Views) TGJB 04/12/2005 05:34PM
Re: Wood Day (362 Views) miff 04/12/2005 05:41PM
Re: Wood Day (369 Views) SJU5 04/12/2005 08:02PM
Re: Wood Day (397 Views) TGJB 04/13/2005 03:24PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.