Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Razzle (367 Views)
Posted by: Caradoc (IP Logged)
Date: April 14, 2005 03:07PM

Mall, the relevant rule is quoted below. The strict interpretation of the rule only requires that horses on the grounds "for racing" be identified and listed; horses on the grounds for other purposes (such as ponies) need not be more speciifically identified or listed. So, you can see it's not that hard to evade the rule.

"The association shall maintain a list or record of all horses admitted to its grounds for racing by name, and such list or record shall also contain the name of the owner or owners of such horses, and the name of the trainers having care of such horses. Such list or record shall be available for inspection by the stewards or the Board. Additions and deletions of horses entering or leaving the grounds shall be made to such list or records within 48 hours of the entering or leaving of a horse."

The van driver's story makes little sense to me as well, not only for the reasons you indicate but for another: there is no indication that any effort was made to conceal SC's identity while she was at the facility being treated. What, any of the people there couldn't pick up the phone and let people on the backside know that SC was being treated there?

Finally, it is quite clear not only from the CHRB's investigation but also from Wygod's own words in the L.A. Times article yesterday that Canani knew nothing about this little caper. In fact, Wygod's position is that he sent SC to the facility to verify what Canani told him about her condition: "I wanted to make sure Julio was telling me everything . . ."



Post Edited (04-14-05 20:28)



Subject Written By Posted
Razzle (657 Views) TGJB 04/13/2005 12:42PM
Re: Razzle (429 Views) razzle 04/13/2005 10:49PM
Re: Razzle (539 Views) razzle 04/14/2005 12:25AM
Re: Razzle (353 Views) Mall 04/14/2005 09:03AM
Re: Razzle (429 Views) Silver Charm 04/14/2005 01:49PM
Re: Razzle (367 Views) Caradoc 04/14/2005 03:07PM
Re: Razzle (396 Views) BitPlayer 04/14/2005 05:11PM
Re: Razzle (393 Views) razzle 04/14/2005 10:51PM
Re: Razzle (386 Views) SJU5 04/14/2005 08:09PM
Re: Razzle (343 Views) razzle 04/14/2005 10:46PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.