Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024  • 2 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Off Topic (980 Views)
Posted by: Mall (IP Logged)
Date: May 20, 2002 02:25PM

Legitimate points. I obviously have no way of knowing exactly what individual sheets players were thinking 30 yrs ago or today when they assess whether a particular horse will or will not bounce. I'd also agree that part of the theory is that each situation must be considered on its own merits. However, if you look at the explanation & comments on the sites, I think you'll find that they are pretty much taken from the Odds, so there does not seem to have been any restatement or modification of the theory. Nor do I recall ever reading or hearing any of the main proponents of the theory ever suggest the possibility that it should be reconsidered in light of major changes which have taken place over the years. Nor do I know of any published research that considers whether & to what extent horses which might be expected to bounce are in fact bouncing. Let me end by asking you & the others interested in this topic a question: Using a category you feel most familiar with, what % of horses which show significant improvement, as you define & explain it, would you expect to bounce in their next start? What I'm suggesting is that I think that the actual answer is going to be different than you might anticipate.



Subject Written By Posted
Off Topic (1722 Views) PP 05/17/2002 06:04PM
Re: Off Topic (1020 Views) Mall 05/17/2002 10:47PM
Re: Off Topic (1030 Views) PP 05/18/2002 01:17AM
Re: I didn't forget about your question PP (1031 Views) Mall 05/21/2002 12:18PM
Re: I didn't forget about your question PP (1068 Views) PP 05/21/2002 08:07PM
Re: I didn't forget about your question PP (1054 Views) Mall 05/22/2002 01:49AM
Re: I didn't forget about your question PP (1085 Views) PP 05/22/2002 02:27AM
Re: Off Topic (994 Views) derby1592 05/17/2002 11:11PM
Re: Off Topic (1014 Views) Mall 05/18/2002 11:42AM
Re: Off Topic (1005 Views) PP 05/18/2002 03:21PM
Re: Off Topic (1075 Views) Alydar in California 05/20/2002 12:35AM
Re: Off Topic (980 Views) Mall 05/20/2002 02:25PM
Re: Off Topic (1042 Views) Alydar in California 05/20/2002 11:02PM
Re: Off Topic (1002 Views) Mall 05/21/2002 12:05PM
Re: Off Topic (1073 Views) Anonymous User 05/21/2002 10:15PM
Clarification on the physiology of the bounce (1017 Views) derby1592 05/21/2002 11:38PM
Re: Clarification on the physiology of the bounce (1105 Views) Alydar in California 05/22/2002 12:12AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.