richiebee wrote:

> Chuckles:
> YOU are the best.

The best handicapper? Thats debatable. The best at 3YO's? I'm competent. Jerkens would ride me. This is about the jockey.

> "It's good to be on the best horse,
> and that's the only horse Hill wins
> on"
>
> Alumni of TGU should also check daily results. Hill's 2
> winners at Belmont Thursday paid $20.80 (second longest shot on
> the board)and $31.00 (longest shot on the board). He had 3
> other mounts on the day.

Richie if hes a family member, we can drop it, hes a .09% rider with serious weight, a twenty buck mutual is break even for this guy. He's changed his style a little lately, hes trying to run and gun, but its like a big two year old trying to run quick, hes all over the place.

Other than his good day yesterday (Weight)he won on two favorites in the last week getting huge (weight). If you're gonna get 15-1 on a horse with a shot, o.k. but you can't seriously believe this guy has the type of talent you require from a high percentage bug rider.

> The best or worst thing that happened to Channing Hill is that
> Drew Mollica, TV personality and jockey agent, now has CH's
> book. Where CH should have been heading to Monmouth to enjoy
> the kind of success Rajiv Maragh enjoyed last summer, it is
> likely he will be headed to the Spa to ride against the top
> guns. I hope he can learn from the experience, because the bug
> has traditionally gone hungry up there.
>

How much bug does he even have left? Can't be much. He's fine at real big odds with the weight and a screaming monkey ride.