Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Alex, the bottom line. (1079 Views)
Posted by: Mall (IP Logged)
Date: June 14, 2005 09:30AM
I have a vague recollection that I went through a comparable example when Smarty retired, but the simularities between the owners & posts are such that it might bear repeating. Let's start out with the not unreasonable assumption that Alex's value as a stallion is the same as Smarty, $39 million. Next yr's premium for ASD/Fertility coverage, assuming there is capacity for the full amount, will be approx 8% of that, or $3.125 million. In other words, to race Alex as a 4 yr old, each of the 4 partners of Cash Is King stable, none of whom is "loaded", would have to write a personal check for $780k. In contrast, if he's syndicated at the end of this yr, each partner would receive a check for $9.75 million. That's a lot to ask relative newcomers to the game to sacrifice for the good of the sport. Even though I'm guessing this assumption is wrong, let's also assume the partners understand these numbers. The question then becomes what do they get in exchange for paying the $3 million plus premium. A chance to break even if Alex wins the BC Classic & just about every other race he enters, plus the possibility, as Ritchey points out, that his value as a stallion increases as a result of his 4yr old campaign. There's also the chance that his value decreases, something the owner of Giacomo understood when he sold a good portion of his breeding rights before the Bel. Let's arbitrarily set the increase/decrease at $10 million, in which case each partner would be looking at making a $750k bet at a little better than 3-1 on the upside. The problem is that the downside isn't capped by the amount of the bet, so it's entirely possible that you're out the $750k for the premium plus $2.5 million for the decrease in value. No matter how much one loves the game, that's a pretty hard bet to make, & it doesn't even take into consideration what happens if, heaven forbid, something happens to the horse. In short, the bottom line consideration driving these decisions as much or more than anything else is the cost & availability of insurance coverage, which dictates that you reach into your own pocket to pay a King's ransom for the privilege of forgoing vast sums of money, just so you can act in accordance with the best interests of the sport. It might happen this time around, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
Alex, the bottom line. (1079 Views) |
Mall |
06/14/2005 09:30AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (687 Views)
|
HP |
06/14/2005 10:21AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (647 Views)
|
Silver Charm |
06/14/2005 11:59AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (4201 Views)
|
|
06/14/2005 03:09PM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (561 Views)
|
HP |
06/14/2005 04:53PM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (492 Views)
|
|
06/15/2005 05:41PM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (592 Views)
|
Mall |
06/14/2005 05:46PM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (491 Views)
|
|
06/15/2005 05:54PM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (486 Views)
|
magicnight |
06/15/2005 06:46PM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (512 Views)
|
|
06/15/2005 07:23PM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (450 Views)
|
bdhsheets |
06/16/2005 01:09AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (442 Views)
|
|
06/16/2005 08:33AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (544 Views)
|
Mall |
06/15/2005 08:29PM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (500 Views)
|
SoCalMan2 |
06/16/2005 03:02AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (499 Views)
|
|
06/16/2005 08:29AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (483 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
06/16/2005 10:36AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (473 Views)
|
richiebee |
06/16/2005 11:28AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (473 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
06/16/2005 12:09PM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (461 Views)
|
richiebee |
06/16/2005 12:38PM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (536 Views)
|
|
06/16/2005 01:40PM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (501 Views)
|
|
06/16/2005 10:35AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (461 Views)
|
HP |
06/16/2005 10:45AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (531 Views)
|
|
06/16/2005 11:04AM |
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (477 Views)
|
JimP |
06/16/2005 11:59AM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|