Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 4 & May 5, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Alex, the bottom line. (1079 Views)
Posted by: Mall (IP Logged)
Date: June 14, 2005 09:30AM

I have a vague recollection that I went through a comparable example when Smarty retired, but the simularities between the owners & posts are such that it might bear repeating. Let's start out with the not unreasonable assumption that Alex's value as a stallion is the same as Smarty, $39 million. Next yr's premium for ASD/Fertility coverage, assuming there is capacity for the full amount, will be approx 8% of that, or $3.125 million. In other words, to race Alex as a 4 yr old, each of the 4 partners of Cash Is King stable, none of whom is "loaded", would have to write a personal check for $780k. In contrast, if he's syndicated at the end of this yr, each partner would receive a check for $9.75 million. That's a lot to ask relative newcomers to the game to sacrifice for the good of the sport. Even though I'm guessing this assumption is wrong, let's also assume the partners understand these numbers. The question then becomes what do they get in exchange for paying the $3 million plus premium. A chance to break even if Alex wins the BC Classic & just about every other race he enters, plus the possibility, as Ritchey points out, that his value as a stallion increases as a result of his 4yr old campaign. There's also the chance that his value decreases, something the owner of Giacomo understood when he sold a good portion of his breeding rights before the Bel. Let's arbitrarily set the increase/decrease at $10 million, in which case each partner would be looking at making a $750k bet at a little better than 3-1 on the upside. The problem is that the downside isn't capped by the amount of the bet, so it's entirely possible that you're out the $750k for the premium plus $2.5 million for the decrease in value. No matter how much one loves the game, that's a pretty hard bet to make, & it doesn't even take into consideration what happens if, heaven forbid, something happens to the horse. In short, the bottom line consideration driving these decisions as much or more than anything else is the cost & availability of insurance coverage, which dictates that you reach into your own pocket to pay a King's ransom for the privilege of forgoing vast sums of money, just so you can act in accordance with the best interests of the sport. It might happen this time around, but I wouldn't hold my breath.



Subject Written By Posted
Alex, the bottom line. (1079 Views) Mall 06/14/2005 09:30AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (687 Views) HP 06/14/2005 10:21AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (647 Views) Silver Charm 06/14/2005 11:59AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (4201 Views) 06/14/2005 03:09PM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (561 Views) HP 06/14/2005 04:53PM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (492 Views) 06/15/2005 05:41PM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (592 Views) Mall 06/14/2005 05:46PM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (491 Views) 06/15/2005 05:54PM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (486 Views) magicnight 06/15/2005 06:46PM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (512 Views) 06/15/2005 07:23PM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (450 Views) bdhsheets 06/16/2005 01:09AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (442 Views) 06/16/2005 08:33AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (544 Views) Mall 06/15/2005 08:29PM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (500 Views) SoCalMan2 06/16/2005 03:02AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (499 Views) 06/16/2005 08:29AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (483 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 06/16/2005 10:36AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (473 Views) richiebee 06/16/2005 11:28AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (473 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 06/16/2005 12:09PM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (461 Views) richiebee 06/16/2005 12:38PM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (536 Views) 06/16/2005 01:40PM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (501 Views) 06/16/2005 10:35AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (461 Views) HP 06/16/2005 10:45AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (531 Views) 06/16/2005 11:04AM
Re: Alex, the bottom line. (477 Views) JimP 06/16/2005 11:59AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.