Richiebee says"So freeze the blood, give owners and trainers Sarbanes Oxley like liability, these are all good ideas, but a lot of the cheaters are making their biggest scores at the windows and not through the award of purse moneys. Purse monies can be redistributed, but pari- mutuel payouts can not."

Richiebee, You appear to be assuming that the cheaters only cheat to win a race and therefore with your experience and some inside info, you have an edge over the betting crowd. I submit that people willing to cheat and collect their ill begotten gains via the pari-mutual windows will just as soon do something to stiff a horse (or horses) as to boost a horse. (Remember the Winter Hill Gang scandal where if memory serves correctly they were paying jockeys to stiff the better horses in a race and then boxed the longshots in exotic bets). Wouldn't you have a tremendous advantage in a race if you know the ML 3-5 fave is not going to run a lick today.
How do you maintain your edge under these circumstances......unless you get the word directly, you are at the same disadvantage as the rest of us. The cleaner that racing is the better for all (except the cheaters). Asfufh