Re: Any reason to believe... (513 Views)
Posted by:
jimbo66 (IP Logged)
Date: August 11, 2005 09:02PM
Good call Michael. I see the logic and obviously you were right. It is the "reward" part that I think sucked. You threw out his most recent races, both of which were sub par and you expected him to run the only race he has ever run that was fast enough to be competitive here. On top of that, you didn't expect any of the other horses that had run fast, to run faster.
For that, you got 5-2.
But I got nothing, so 5-2 is better than nothing...... :)
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.