Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024  • 2 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Fig methodology questions (412 Views)
Posted by: (IP Logged)
Date: October 30, 2005 05:27PM

Jerry,

"6-- What those who have not made projection figures don't get (especially if they have read Beyer or some of the earlier books which push the use of pars) is that it's not just about the winners. When you have a tight data base using weight and ground you use lots of horses within each race to make your figures."

This is really not true. Beyer never advocated making projection variants based on just the winner. He uses all the horses in the race also. His references to using PARs were mostly limited to the first few weeks you start making figures at a track until you have enough data to make projections.

The question of tweaking figures to keep them in line with expected PARs over time is another issue, but I haven't been able to get the full answer to that.




Subject Written By Posted
Fig methodology questions (618 Views) SP 10/30/2005 04:46PM
Re: Fig methodology questions (504 Views) TGJB 10/30/2005 05:17PM
Re: Fig methodology questions (412 Views) 10/30/2005 05:27PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.