Re: BC Main Track Bias (380 Views)
Posted by:
scottv (IP Logged)
Date: October 30, 2005 05:19PM
I beg to differ. I think the track was just not speed favoring, like many two turn (mile) tracks are in the US.
The Distaff had tons of pace and set up perfectly for a closer.
IMO, the sprint was going to have a fast pace due to the smaller field, and TP nearly won it.
There was no speed in the classic and consequently the best stalker won.
Turf course was biased as soft turf favored those horses on or near the lead.
Again, if these races had been run at SAnita, or LoneStar, you could argue that a totally different outcome would have occurred.
Churchill next year should offer some fair play as well.
Till then
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.