In David's case the attacks are justified--he has been astoundingly evasive and dishonest. The reason I don't react as violently as Alydar (most of the time) is that I have learned that most reading here are actually following this close enough to get it. Have you seen anyone come in to back up any of David or Jim's arguments? And it's not because Raggies don't come here--lots do. And they recognize he has left dozens of direct questions unanswered, instead setting up convoluted hypotheticals based on tons of his own assumptions.

We posted the Wood at the time, and here it is again.



TGJB