Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (529 Views)
Posted by: Bally Ache (IP Logged)
Date: May 25, 2006 02:36PM

Okay, this string has definitely become too one-sided. Let's even it up a bit. The NYT, as it exists (not as you may want to fondly remember it), is in big trouble. That's not opinion, that's fact. And it will continue slouching toward Bethlehem until the Sulzburgers realize that their financial well-being precludes allowing Pinch S. to march to the drummers of political correctness until he runs it into the ground. (Take a breath)

The conclusion drawn by the editorial is that three yr. old thoroughbreds are immature. Yes, we all know they don't mature until five. Not racing them until five is economically untenable. Anyone who has more than a kindergarten level of knowledge about this game knows that. It seems to me that the purpose of imallin's post was to call attention to this. And he's not wrong.


Since this is a horseracing board I'll cut this diatribe short by simply saying the NYT is a mirror image of the New York Post. That is, The Post is a right-wing rag and the Times has become a left-wing rag.



Subject Written By Posted
New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (970 Views) Thehoarsehorseplayer 05/23/2006 09:51AM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (649 Views) imallin 05/24/2006 02:25PM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (616 Views) devilinahorsesuit 05/24/2006 02:53PM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (654 Views) Kasept 05/24/2006 03:29PM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (571 Views) NoCarolinaTony 05/24/2006 03:45PM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (574 Views) devilinahorsesuit 05/24/2006 04:00PM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (531 Views) bellsbendboy 05/24/2006 04:09PM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (665 Views) imallin 05/25/2006 02:32AM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (525 Views) richiebee 05/25/2006 10:34AM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (569 Views) asfufh 05/25/2006 10:57AM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (534 Views) NoCarolinaTony 05/25/2006 12:29PM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (529 Views) Bally Ache 05/25/2006 02:36PM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (580 Views) devilinahorsesuit 05/25/2006 04:53PM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (646 Views) TGJB 05/25/2006 05:12PM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (558 Views) flushedstraight 05/25/2006 10:48PM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (549 Views) marcus 05/26/2006 08:41AM
Re: New York Times editorial RE: Barbaro (563 Views) Bally Ache 05/26/2006 11:10AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.