Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: On the contrary (502 Views)
Posted by: Michael D. (IP Logged)
Date: July 11, 2006 11:59AM

John,

you wrote:

"Also, in one scenario, the IRS immediately withholds 12k of a 48k take. You lawfully report it later, perhaps to have some or all of it refunded to you. In another scenario, a bettor takes the entire 48k home with him, puts it in the bank, gets interest on it, and lawfully reports the episode later to the IRS. Which scenario is better?"

again, the IRS knows if you go to the window multiple times to collect on a signer. you can check "no" in the "do you have duplicate wagers" box, but the IRS system matches these things up. you will take the 48g home with you, put it in the bank, collect the interest, get a notice in the mail from the IRS, then wind up paying the interest right back to the fed (at a higher rate no doubt). you might also face penalties.

if you are going to cheat, well, you shouldn't be going to the window yourself at all.

when it comes to amounts around the $600 lvl, it's a different story, as you say. if it's a $400 payoff for a buck, you don't want to be holding a $2 ticket. i usually try to bet in the smallest possible increment for just this reason.





Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 07/11/2006 12:41PM by Michael D..



Subject Written By Posted
ten cent supers and 50 cent trifectas (969 Views) 1st time lasix 07/10/2006 01:23PM
Re: ten cent supers and 50 cent trifectas (647 Views) high roller 07/10/2006 01:51PM
On the contrary (722 Views) 1st time lasix 07/10/2006 02:01PM
Re: On the contrary (659 Views) JohnTChance 07/10/2006 05:35PM
Re: On the contrary (632 Views) Michael D. 07/10/2006 05:45PM
Re: On the contrary (614 Views) JohnTChance 07/10/2006 05:59PM
Re: On the contrary (679 Views) Michael D. 07/10/2006 07:01PM
Re: On the contrary (611 Views) JohnTChance 07/10/2006 07:24PM
Re: On the contrary (585 Views) NoCarolinaTony 07/10/2006 10:19PM
Re: On the contrary (589 Views) ezgoer89 07/10/2006 07:29PM
Re: On the contrary (585 Views) NoCarolinaTony 07/10/2006 10:52PM
Re: On the contrary (616 Views) Boscar Obarra 07/10/2006 11:23PM
Re: On the contrary (538 Views) JohnTChance 07/11/2006 11:06AM
Re: On the contrary (558 Views) ezgoer89 07/11/2006 11:43AM
Re: On the contrary (502 Views) Michael D. 07/11/2006 11:59AM
Re: On the contrary (520 Views) colin 07/11/2006 12:46PM
Re: Exotic Betting (631 Views) BitPlayer 07/12/2006 09:16AM
Re: Exotic Betting (605 Views) JohnTChance 07/12/2006 02:27PM
Re: Exotic Betting (560 Views) MO 07/12/2006 11:44PM
Re: Exotic Betting (552 Views) richiebee 07/13/2006 05:01AM
Re: Exotic Betting (517 Views) JohnTChance 07/13/2006 11:07AM
Re: Exotic Betting (608 Views) NoCarolinaTony 07/14/2006 12:19AM
Re: Exotic Betting (524 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 07/13/2006 07:23AM
Re: Exotic Betting (501 Views) BitPlayer 07/17/2006 12:09PM
Re: ten cent supers and 50 cent trifectas (544 Views) affirmedny 07/13/2006 10:29AM
Re: ten cent supers and 50 cent trifectas (469 Views) Boscar Obarra 07/19/2006 01:28AM
Re: t10 cent supers and 50 cent tris (508 Views) 1st time lasix 07/19/2006 10:57AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.