Jerry,

Here is my response to Indulto on other board:

"If you read my prior posts on the subject on either board -- same handle on both -- you would know that I think the study is totally flawed and capable of proving nothing. I was not celebrating anything because the study is worthless. But when one side sticks there neck out and says the study will in fact show who has the more accurate figures, well that side has everything to lose. I can guarantee you that if the results were the other way around, there would have been a lot of chirping on the other board. I wasn't even following it until today when I noticed absolutely no discussion and it piqued my curiousity. I don't really care who has the most accurate figures as I think reading patterns is the most important piece of handicapping and betting strategy/value plays are the rest. I tend to use the TG product for Turf races because (a) to JB's credit I can buy a Turf only package online and (b) I have had success doing so. At the track I usually buy the Rags."

I didn't think that activity on this board was in any way linked to your whereabouts. I apologize for the sarcastic manner in which I simply posted the first weeks results. That is my personality and I'm sticking to it. I really have no dog in this fight.