Re: BEYER BEWARE-ANY COMMENT FROM JERRY? (516 Views)
Posted by:
Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: March 24, 2007 06:46PM
I'm not sure about the Beyer Whirlaway, both the original and the correction. But inner numbers can be fickle. This looks like a Tgraph race to me and what they say I'd probably back, but I don't know what they have on it.
I will say this. Regardless of what the Whirlaway number actually is I except Summer Doldrums to run a much improved Wood. He is a good horse and his sire is the hottest thing going.
(Later, thx Jerry, I do know what the Whirlaway is now and it looks like a very logical number.)
By the way, one bad apple can spoil the whole bunch. But a bad apple can be corrected in next race extrapolation too.
miff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> JB,
>
> Re the wind on Feb 10th.
>
> 1.This was a two turn race and the wind direction
> has little relevance since they run into it and
> with it for app the same distance.
>
> 2.The wind picking up would suck moisture out of
> the surface and make it slower rather than
> faster.
>
> What made you conclude that the track was 3 points
> faster than the previous race. Your fig made more
> sense than Beyer or Rags but your explanation is a
> little unclear
>
>
> Mike
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/24/2007 07:04PM by Chuckles_the_Clown2.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.